What Optimistic Responses to Deep Disagreement get Right (and Wrong)
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
What ’ s Right , What ’ s WRong , and What ’ s Fixable
ExEcutivE compEnsation has suddEnly bEcomE a high-profile topic about which almost everyone has an opinion. Many shareholders, workers, and politicians believe that the entire system is broken and requires a substantial overhaul. The purpose of this piece is to take a hard look at the facts and assess whether the situation is as bad as some people fear. It also proposes the “Incentive Account” ...
متن کاملMoral value transfer from regulatory fit: what feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong.
People experience regulatory fit (E. T. Higgins, 2000) when the strategic manner of their goal pursuit suits their regulatory orientation, and this regulatory fit feels right. Fit violation feels wrong. Four studies tested the proposal that experiences of fit can transfer to moral evaluations. The authors examined transfer of feeling wrong from fit violation by having participants in a promotio...
متن کاملFinancial Liberalization: What Went Right,What Went Wrong?
that took place in the developing countries in the 1980s and 1990s was part of the general move toward giving markets a greater role in development. It was also a reaction to several factors specific to finance: the costs, corruption, and inefficiencies associated with using finance as an instrument of populist, state-led development; a desire for more financial resources; citizens’ demands for...
متن کاملWhat can we do ( technically ) to get “ the right specification ” ?
One can use formal approaches either post facto to try to show that a program has desirable properties (main of which is that it satisfies a specification); or one can go for correctness by construction. I not only prefer the latter but I have also argued that this is the main way to get formal methods to pay off: there is more mileage in getting a clean architecture than in trying to debug a b...
متن کاملCritical Study of Right to be wrong From the point of view ofcollectivists, utilitarians, and virtuosos
circuit right discourse is one of the most common theories in the contemporary period about regulating human social relations. The formation of this course of thought and the exhibition of a unidimensional understanding of the concept of right in the West is the result of socio-political changes in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. It was during this period that thinkers’ response to th...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Co-herencia
سال: 2020
ISSN: 1794-5887,2539-1208
DOI: 10.17230/co-herencia.17.32.8